Template:MultimediaDistribution:E2EProtocol - Cronologia

Ldecicco: /* End-to-end transport protocol */

2007-02-02T14:57:53Z

‎End-to-end transport protocol

2007-02-02T14:56:27Z

‎End-to-end transport protocol

2007-02-01T12:52:35Z

‎End-to-end transport protocol

2007-02-01T12:44:22Z

‎End-to-end transport protocol

2007-02-01T12:26:02Z

‎References

2007-02-01T12:25:01Z

‎References

2007-02-01T12:23:43Z

‎References

2007-02-01T11:58:17Z

‎References

2007-02-01T11:40:43Z

MultimediaDistribution:E2EProtocol moved to Template:MultimediaDistribution:E2EProtocol

2007-02-01T11:39:03Z

‎End-to-end transport protocol

@@ Riga 1: / Riga 1: @@
 <accesscontrol>Lab</accesscontrol>
 == End-to-end transport protocol ==
 The end to end transport protocol is a key component of the system. We address the problem of congestion control of multimedia contents which is still a very active research topic.

@@ Riga 20: / Riga 20: @@
 ===References===
 <paper authors="L. A. Grieco and S. Mascolo" date="April 2004" place="Vol. 34(2)" conference="ACM Computer Communication Review" pdf="ccr_v31.pdf">
 Performance evaluation and comparison of Westwood+, New Reno and Vegas TCP congestion control
 </paper>
 <paper authors="M. Handley, S. Floyd,  J. Pahdye, J. Widmer" conference="RFC 3448" date="Jan 2003" >
 TCP Friendly Rate control (TFRC): Protocol Specification
 </paper>
 <paper authors="M. Handley, E. Kohler, S. Floyd" conference="RFC 4340" date="Mar 2006" >
 Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP)
 </paper>
 <paper authors="S. Floyd, E. Kohler" conference="IETF Draft" date="Mar 2006">
 TCP Friendly Rate Control (TFRC): the Small-Packet (SP) Variant
 </paper>

@@ Riga 1: / Riga 1: @@
 <accesscontrol>Lab</accesscontrol>
 == End-to-end transport protocol ==
 The end to end transport protocol is a key component of the system. We address the problem of congestion control of multimedia contents which is still a very active research topic.
 Multimedia congestion control differs from bulk data congestion protocols in several aspects:

@@ Riga 12: / Riga 12: @@
 Several congestion control algorithms for multimedia transport have been proposed in the last years such as TEAR and TFRC (TCP Friendly Rate Control), and recently DCCP which is a kernel space implementation of TFRC.
 Our purpose is to design and implement in user space a protocol a-la Westwood+ which will be able to scale from low bandwidth links (few Kbps such as GSM) to very high bandwidth links (such as gigabit networks).
 Moreover we aim at integrating the congestion control algorithm with a quality adaptation layer which is in charge of adapting the quality in the underlying encoder in order to get the maximum audio/video quality without congesting the network and losing packets.

@@ Riga 28: / Riga 28: @@
 </paper>
-<paper authors="S. Floyd, E. Kohler" conference="IETF Draft" date="Mar 2006"
+<paper authors="S. Floyd, E. Kohler" conference="IETF Draft" date="Mar 2006">
 TCP Friendly Rate Control (TFRC): the Small-Packet (SP) Variant
 </paper>

←Older revision	Revisione 11:40, 1 Feb 2007
(Nessuna differenza)

←Older revision		Revisione 11:39, 1 Feb 2007
Riga 14:		Riga 14:

	Moreover we aim at integrating the congestion control algorithm with a quality adaptation layer which is in charge of adapting the quality in the underlying encoder in order to get the maximum audio/video quality without congesting the network and losing packets.		Moreover we aim at integrating the congestion control algorithm with a quality adaptation layer which is in charge of adapting the quality in the underlying encoder in order to get the maximum audio/video quality without congesting the network and losing packets.
		+
		+	===References===
		+	<paper authors="M. Handley, S. Floyd, J. Pahdye, J. Widmer" conference="RFC 3448" date="Jan 2003" >
		+	TCP Friendly Rate control (TFRC): Protocol Specification
		+	</paper>