(RTT vs Goodput: HSDPA downlink flows case)
 
Riga 1: Riga 1:
[[TCP_over_Hsdpa | Back]]
+
{{Hsdpa_links}}
 
==RTT vs Goodput: HSDPA downlink flows case==
 
==RTT vs Goodput: HSDPA downlink flows case==
 
'''Goodput is roughly equal for all the considered TCPs, but TCP BIC/Cubic exhibit  larger RTT.
 
'''Goodput is roughly equal for all the considered TCPs, but TCP BIC/Cubic exhibit  larger RTT.

Versione attuale delle 18:19, 2 Dic 2008

GoodputRTTPLR/TimeoutsGoodput/RTT
Back downlink/ uplink downlink/ uplink downlink / uplink downlink / uplink

RTT vs Goodput: HSDPA downlink flows case

Goodput is roughly equal for all the considered TCPs, but TCP BIC/Cubic exhibit larger RTT.

Larger markers in the figures indicate values averaged over all the experiments

Hsdpa rtt gp 1 flow downlink.png Hsdpa rtt gp 2 flows downlink.pngHsdpa rtt gp 3 flows downlink.pngHsdpa rtt gp 4 flows downlink.png

GoodputRTTPLR/TimeoutsGoodput/RTT
Back downlink/ uplink downlink/ uplink downlink / uplink downlink / uplink

RTT vs Goodput: HSDPA downlink flows case[edit]

Goodput is roughly equal for all the considered TCPs, but TCP BIC/Cubic exhibit larger RTT.

Larger markers in the figures indicate values averaged over all the experiments

Hsdpa rtt gp 1 flow downlink.png Hsdpa rtt gp 2 flows downlink.pngHsdpa rtt gp 3 flows downlink.pngHsdpa rtt gp 4 flows downlink.png