Differenze tra le versioni di "VideoConference"

 
Riga 3: Riga 3:
  
 
==BEST application versus Skype Video==
 
==BEST application versus Skype Video==
−
<p style="font-size:1.5em;"><a name="skype"></a>'''BEST''' (Bandwidth Estimation) application versus Skype video over a time-varying variable bandwidth, RTT=100ms.
+
<p style="font-size:1.5em;">'''BEST''' (Bandwidth Estimation) application versus Skype video over a time-varying variable bandwidth, RTT=100ms.
 
Technical features: H.264 codec, Bandwidth Estimation, Adaptation, Congestion Control, FEC</p>
 
Technical features: H.264 codec, Bandwidth Estimation, Adaptation, Congestion Control, FEC</p>
 
<absHTML>
 
<absHTML>
 +
<a name="skype"></a>
 
<div id="container"><a href="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer">Get the Flash Player</a> to see this player.</div>
 
<div id="container"><a href="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer">Get the Flash Player</a> to see this player.</div>
 
<script type="text/javascript" src="/video/mediaplayer/swfobject.js"></script>
 
<script type="text/javascript" src="/video/mediaplayer/swfobject.js"></script>
Riga 28: Riga 29:
  
 
==BEST application versus Google Videochat==
 
==BEST application versus Google Videochat==
−
<a name="google"></a>
 
 
<p style="font-size:1.5em;">'''BEST''' (Bandwidth Estimation) application versus Google VideoChat over a time-varying variable bandwidth, RTT=100ms.
 
<p style="font-size:1.5em;">'''BEST''' (Bandwidth Estimation) application versus Google VideoChat over a time-varying variable bandwidth, RTT=100ms.
 
Technical features: H.264 codec, Bandwidth Estimation, Adaptation, Congestion Control, FEC</p>
 
Technical features: H.264 codec, Bandwidth Estimation, Adaptation, Congestion Control, FEC</p>
 
<absHTML>
 
<absHTML>
 +
<a name="google"></a>
 
<div id="container2"><a href="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer">Get the Flash Player</a> to see this player.</div>
 
<div id="container2"><a href="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer">Get the Flash Player</a> to see this player.</div>
 
<script type="text/javascript" src="/video/mediaplayer/swfobject.js"></script>
 
<script type="text/javascript" src="/video/mediaplayer/swfobject.js"></script>

Versione attuale delle 10:43, 6 Mag 2009

Quality Adaptation for Video Conference Applications

BEST application versus Skype Video

BEST (Bandwidth Estimation) application versus Skype video over a time-varying variable bandwidth, RTT=100ms. Technical features: H.264 codec, Bandwidth Estimation, Adaptation, Congestion Control, FEC

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

Bands


Skype® is a registered trademark of Skype Ltd.

BEST application versus Google Videochat

BEST (Bandwidth Estimation) application versus Google VideoChat over a time-varying variable bandwidth, RTT=100ms. Technical features: H.264 codec, Bandwidth Estimation, Adaptation, Congestion Control, FEC

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

Bands


Google® is a registered trademark.

Ricavato da "https://c3lab.poliba.it/index.php?title=VideoConference&oldid=3701"

Quality Adaptation for Video Conference Applications[edit]

BEST application versus Skype Video[edit]

BEST (Bandwidth Estimation) application versus Skype video over a time-varying variable bandwidth, RTT=100ms. Technical features: H.264 codec, Bandwidth Estimation, Adaptation, Congestion Control, FEC

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

Bands


Skype® is a registered trademark of Skype Ltd.

BEST application versus Google Videochat[edit]

BEST (Bandwidth Estimation) application versus Google VideoChat over a time-varying variable bandwidth, RTT=100ms. Technical features: H.264 codec, Bandwidth Estimation, Adaptation, Congestion Control, FEC

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

Bands


Google® is a registered trademark.