Riga 12: | Riga 12: | ||
This paper considers the case of real-time communication between web browsers (WebRTC) and we focus on the interplay of an end-to-end delay-based | This paper considers the case of real-time communication between web browsers (WebRTC) and we focus on the interplay of an end-to-end delay-based | ||
− | congestion control algorithm with delay-based AQM algorithms, namely CoDel and PIE, and flow queuing schedulers, i.e. SFQ and Fq Codel. | + | congestion control algorithm with delay-based AQM algorithms, namely <b>CoDel<\b> and <b>PIE<\b>, and flow queuing schedulers, i.e. <b>SFQ<\b> and <b>Fq Codel<b>. |
Delay sensitive applications require not only congestion control but also minimization of queuing delays to provide interactivity.
This paper considers the case of real-time communication between web browsers (WebRTC) and we focus on the interplay of an end-to-end delay-based
congestion control algorithm with delay-based AQM algorithms, namely CoDel<\b> and <b>PIE<\b>, and flow queuing schedulers, i.e. <b>SFQ<\b> and <b>Fq Codel<b>.
Delay sensitive applications require not only congestion control but also minimization of queuing delays to provide interactivity.
This paper considers the case of real-time communication between web browsers (WebRTC) and we focus on the interplay of an end-to-end delay-based
congestion control algorithm with delay-based AQM algorithms, namely CoDel<\b> and <b>PIE<\b>, and flow queuing schedulers, i.e. <b>SFQ<\b> and <b>Fq Codel<b>.